4.5 Article

Depressed mood, glycaemic control and functional capacity in overweight/obese men with and without type 2 diabetes

期刊

DIABETOLOGY & METABOLIC SYNDROME
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1758-5996-4-46

关键词

Aerobic power; Cardiac Depression Scale; Depression; Glycaemic control; Type 2 diabetes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine whether there were differences in depressed mood between overweight/obese men with and without type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and to examine any associations between depressed mood, physical functioning, and glycaemic control in overweight/obese men with and without T2DM. Methods: Fifty seven overweight/obese men with (n = 19, age = 54.2 +/- 7.4 yrs, BMI = 32.3 +/- 6.7 kg.m(-2)) and without T2DM (n = 38, age = 51.1 +/- 6.8 yrs, BMI = 29.9 +/- 4.5 kg.m(-2), p > 0.05 between groups) participated. The men completed measures of depressed mood and health-related quality of life (HRQL) and underwent the following assessments: fasting blood lipids and glucose, HbA1c, anthropometric measurements, VO2peak, muscle strength, and physical function. Results: Compared to men without T2DM, men with T2DM had higher depressed mood (p = 0.05, eta(2) = 0.07), as well as lower perceived general health (p < .01, eta(2) = 0.24) and social functioning (p = .01, eta(2) = 0.10). Men with T2DM also had lower VO2peak (21.8 +/- 5.3 versus 25.8 +/- 5.4 ml.kg(-1).min(-1), p < .01, eta(2) = 0.11) and muscle strength (3.3 +/- 0.8 versus 3.7 +/- 0.7 kg.kg(-1), p = 0.08, eta(2) = 0.06), as well as being slower to complete physical performance tasks (27.2 +/- 5.2 versus 24.2 +/- 2.8 sec, p < 0.01, eta(2) = 0.13). In those with T2DM, depressed mood was highly correlated with most HRQL subscales. For the combined cohort, depressed mood was correlated with fasting glucose (r = 0.31, p = 0.012) but not the functional measures. Conclusions: Men with T2DM have higher levels of depressed mood compared to men without T2DM. Glycaemic control, but not functional capacities, is associated with depressed mood in the study cohort.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据