4.4 Article

Psychological Treatments for Binge Eating Disorder

期刊

CURRENT PSYCHIATRY REPORTS
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 432-446

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11920-012-0277-8

关键词

Binge eating disorder; Eating disorders; Loss of control; Psychological treatments; Treatment review; Randomized controlled trials; Cognitive behavioral therapy; Guided self-help; Interpersonal psychotherapy; Behavioral weight loss; Dialectical behavior therapy

资金

  1. NIDDK [5T32HL007456]
  2. NIMH [5K24MH070446-09, 1R01MH095748, 5R29MH051384]
  3. CTSA [UL1RR024992]
  4. Washington University Chancellor's Graduate Fellowship Program
  5. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  6. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Binge eating disorder (BED) is the most prevalent eating disorder in adults, and individuals with BED report greater general and specific psychopathology than non-eating disordered individuals. The current paper reviews research on psychological treatments for BED, including the rationale and empirical support for cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT), dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), behavioral weight loss (BWL), and other treatments warranting further study. Research supports the effectiveness of CBT and IPT for the treatment of BED, particularly for those with higher eating disorder and general psychopathology. Guided self-help CBT has shown efficacy for BED without additional pathology. DBT has shown some promise as a treatment for BED, but requires further study to determine its long-term efficacy. Predictors and moderators of treatment response, such as weight and shape concerns, are highlighted and a stepped-care model proposed. Future directions include expanding the adoption of efficacious treatments in clinical practice, testing adapted treatments in diverse samples (e.g., minorities and youth), improving treatment outcomes for nonresponders, and developing efficient and cost-effective stepped-care models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据