4.4 Article

Mirror on the Wall: A Study of Women's Perception of Facial Features as They Age

期刊

AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL
卷 32, 期 4, 页码 421-425

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1090820X12442083

关键词

facial aesthetic surgery; invasive plastic surgery; minimally-invasive plastic surgery; noninvasive plastic surgery; patient expectations; patient selection; self-perception

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Facial aesthetic treatments are among the most popular cosmetic procedures worldwide, but the factors that motivate women to change their facial appearance are not fully understood. Objectives: The authors examine the relationships among the facial areas on which women focus most as they age, women's general self-perception, and the effect of their personal focus on beauty points on their perception of other women's faces. Methods: In this prospective study, 200 women who presented to a cosmetic surgery outpatient clinic for consultation between December 2009 and February 2010 completed a questionnaire. The 200 participants were grouped by age: 20-29 years, 30-39, 40-49, and 50 or older (50 women in each group). They were asked which part of their face they focus on most when looking in the mirror, which part they notice most in other women (of different age groups), what they like/dislike most about their own face, and whether they wished to change any facial feature. Results: A positive correlation was found between women's focal points and the areas they dislike or desire to change. Younger women focused mainly on their nose and skin, while older women focused on their periorbital area and jawline. Women focus on their personal focal points when looking at other women in their 20s and 30s, but not when looking at older women. Conclusions: Women presenting for cosmetic surgery consultation focus on the areas that they dislike most, which leads to a desire to change those features. The plastic surgeon must fully understand patients' expectations to select appropriate candidates and maximize satisfaction with the outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据