4.4 Article

Can BSNE (Big Spring Number Eight) samplers be used to measure PM10, respirable dust, PM2.5 and PM1.0?

期刊

AEOLIAN RESEARCH
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 43-49

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.aeolia.2012.03.002

关键词

BSNE sampler; DustTrak; PM10; Dust; Wind tunnel

资金

  1. US Bureau of Land Management (BLM) through a Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act (SNPLMA) Conservation Initiative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wind tunnel and field measurements were conducted to evaluate whether the Big Spring Number Eight (BSNE) sampler can be used to measure ambient concentrations of PM10 (particles less that 10 mu m), respirable dust (particles less than 4 mu m or PM4), PM2.5 (particles less than 2.5 mu m) and PM1.0 (particles less than 1 mu m). The BSNE was tested against the DustTrak Aerosol Monitor and relationships with several other active automated samplers were investigated. Concentrations obtained from BSNE and DustTrak samplers tend to be comparable (less than 50% difference) within the wind speed interval 2-7 m s(-1) (PM10) or 2-9 m s(-1)(PM4, PM2.5, PM1.0) provided appropriate corrections are made for sampler efficiency, cut-off percentage and data transfer from mass to volume (or reverse). For wind speeds <2 m s(-1) the DustTrak significantly underestimates the concentration compared to the BSNE. No data were available from this study for wind speeds >10 m s(-1). Field measurements confirmed the wind tunnel data, but only for PM10. No field information was available for PM4, PM2.5 and PM 1.0. Comparisons with data from the literature suggest that the BSNE behaves similar to several active automated gravimetric samplers, at least for PM10 and within the wind speed interval 1-5 m s(-1). No data were available to confirm this conclusion for higher wind speeds or other size fractions. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据