4.8 Article

Hydrogen-Transfer Catalysis with Cp*IrIII Complexes: The Influence of the Ancillary Ligands

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 4, 期 1, 页码 99-108

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cs400834q

关键词

transfer hydrogenation; Cp*Ir complexes; N-heterocyclic carbenes; homogeneous catalysis; kinetics; monohydride mechanism

资金

  1. Center for Catalytic Hydrocarbon Functionalization, an Energy Frontier Research Center
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001298]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences catalysis [DE-FG02-84ER13297]
  4. U.S. DoE [1043588]
  5. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  6. Yale Institute for Nanoscience and Quantum Engineering
  7. Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies at the University of Bath
  8. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-84ER13297] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fourteen Cp*Ir-III complexes, bearing various combinations of N- and C-spectator ligands, are assayed in hydrogen-transfer catalysis from isopropyl alcohol to acetophenone under various conditions to investigate ligand effects in this widely used reaction. The new cationic complexes bearing monodentate pyridine and N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) ligands were characterized crystallographically and by variable-temperature nuclear magnetic resonance (VT-NMR). Control experiments and mercury poisoning tests showed that iridium(0) nanoparticles, although active in the reaction, are not responsible for the high activity observed for the most active precatalyst [Cp*Ir(IMe)(2)Cl]B-4 (6). For efficient catalysis, it was found necessary to have both NHCs in monodentate form; tying them together in a bis-NHC chelate ligand gave greatly reduced activity. The kinetics of the base-assisted reaction showed induction periods as well as deactivation processes, and H/D scrambling experiments cast some doubt on the classical monohydride mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据