4.8 Article

Psychophysical reverse correlation reflects both sensory and decision-making processes

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05797-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-MH109180]
  2. Sloan Research fellowship
  3. McKnight Scholar Award
  4. NRSA [R90-1R90DA043849]
  5. Simons Collaboration on the Global Brain
  6. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  7. Charles H. Revson Foundation
  8. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [P30EY013079] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH109180] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  10. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R90DA043849] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Goal-directed behavior depends on both sensory mechanisms that gather information from the outside world and decision-making mechanisms that select appropriate behavior based on that sensory information. Psychophysical reverse correlation is commonly used to quantify how fluctuations of sensory stimuli influence behavior and is generally believed to uncover the spatiotemporal weighting functions of sensory processes. Here we show that reverse correlations also reflect decision-making processes and can deviate significantly from the true sensory filters. Specifically, changes of decision bound and mechanisms of evidence integration systematically alter psychophysical reverse correlations. Similarly, trial-to-trial variability of sensory and motor delays and decision times causes systematic distortions in psychophysical kernels that should not be attributed to sensory mechanisms. We show that ignoring details of the decision-making process results in misinterpretation of reverse correlations, but proper use of these details turns reverse correlation into a powerful method for studying both sensory and decision-making mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据