4.8 Article

Nanomechanical cleavage of molybdenum disulphide atomic layers

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4631

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI Grant [25820336]
  2. International Center for Young Scientists (ICYS)
  3. World Premier International (WPI) Center for Materials Nanoarchitectonics (MANA) of the National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS)
  4. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation [11.G34.31.0061]
  5. FAEMCAR
  6. EU-ERC INTIF [226639]
  7. Russian Ministry of Education and Science [948]
  8. Welch Foundation [C-1716]
  9. NSF [ECCS-1327093]
  10. U.S. Army Research Office MURI Grant [W911NF-11-1-0362]
  11. Academy of Finland
  12. Directorate For Engineering
  13. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys [1327093] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  14. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25820336] Funding Source: KAKEN
  15. European Research Council (ERC) [226639] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The discovery of two-dimensional materials became possible due to the mechanical cleavage technique. Despite its simplicity, the as-cleaved materials demonstrated surprising macro-continuity, high crystalline quality and extraordinary mechanical and electrical properties that triggered global research interest. Here such cleavage processes and associated mechanical behaviours are investigated by a direct in situ transmission electron microscopy probing technique, using atomically thin molybdenum disulphide layers as a model material. Our technique demonstrates layer number selective cleavage, from a monolayer to double layer and up to 23 atomic layers. In situ observations combined with molecular dynamics simulations reveal unique layer-dependent bending behaviours, from spontaneous rippling (<5 atomic layers) to homogeneous curving (similar to 10 layers) and finally to kinking (20 or more layers), depending on the competition of strain energy and interfacial energy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据