4.4 Article

Expression of Toll-like receptor-9 is associated with poor progression-free survival in prostate cancer

期刊

ONCOLOGY LETTERS
卷 5, 期 5, 页码 1659-1663

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2013.1204

关键词

prostate cancer; Toll-like receptor-9; prognosis

类别

资金

  1. Finnish Urological Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Toll-like receptor-9 (TLR9) is a member of the innate immune system and recognizes bacterial and vertebrate DNA in cells. In addition to being expressed in cells of the immune system, it is widely expressed in various types of human cancer, including prostate cancer. We have previously demonstrated that synthetic TLR9 ligands induce invasion in TLR9-expressing prostate cancer cells in vitro. However, the role of TLR9 in the pathophysiology of prostate cancer is unclear. The expression of TLR9 in radical prostatectomy samples (n=186) was studied using immunohistochemistry. TLR9 staining scores were compared with tumor stage, Gleason score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration prior to treatment and progression-free survival. Results revealed that 124 (66.7%) of the tumors were strongly positive, 59 (31.7%) were weakly positive and 3 (1.6%) were negative, for cytoplasmic TLR9 immunostaining in cancer cells. There was no significant association between cytoplasmic TLR9 expression and distributions of pT-class, prostatectomy sample margin status, Gleason score and preoperative PSA value. Prostate cancer-specific progression-free survival was significantly longer for patients whose tumors were graded as negative for cytoplasmic TLR9 expression, as compared with patients whose tumors were strongly immunopositive for cytoplasmic TLR9 (P=0.009). In the Cox regression analysis, high TLR9 expression was an independent marker of poor prognosis in prostate cancer. Expression of TLR9 is associated with poor progression-free survival in prostate cancer patients who were treated by radical prostatectomy with curative intent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据