4.3 Article

Phytate utilization of maize mediated by different nitrogen forms in a plant-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus-phosphate-solubilizing bacterium system

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT INTERACTIONS
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 514-520

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17429145.2013.861028

关键词

Funelliformis mosseae; Pseudomonas alcaligenes M20; organic P; ammonium; nitrate; phosphatase activity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31201693, 31372139]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20120008130001]
  3. Science Foundation of Guangdong province [S2012040006938]
  4. Guangdong Academy of Sciences [qnjjsq201102, rcjj201202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A pot experiment was conducted to investigate the organic phosphorus (P) (phytate) utilization of Zea mays L. with different nitrogen (N) forms (NH4+ and NO3-) when both arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus (Funelliformis mosseae) and phosphate-solubilizing bacterium (PSB, Pseudomonas alcaligenes) are present. The soil was supplied with either KNO3 or (NH4)(2)SO4 (200 mg kg(-1) N) with or without phytin (75 mg P kg(-1)). Results showed that the application of NH4+ to the soil in a plant-AM fungus-PSB system decreased rhizosphere pH and increased phosphatase activity. It also enhanced the mineralization rate of phytin, which resulted in the release of more inorganic P. The application of NO(3)(-)promoted mycorrhizal colonization and hyphal length density in the soil. The inorganic P in the hyphosphere decreased, but more P was transferred to the plant through the mycorrhizal hyphae. Hence, in addition, the application of the two different N forms did not significantly alter the content of plant P. The plant supplied with different N fertilizers acquired P through different mechanisms associated with other microbes. NH4+ application promoted phytin mineralization by decreasing soil pH, whereas NO(3)(-)application increased inorganic P uptake by strengthening the mycorrhizal pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据