4.7 Article

Melittin-induced long non-coding RNA NONHSAT105177 inhibits proliferation and migration of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

期刊

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41419-018-0965-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. Shanghai Sailing Program [18YF1414600]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [17ZR1417800]
  3. Medical-Engineering Cross Foundation of Shanghai Jiao Tong University [YG2017QN52]
  4. Doctoral Innovation Fund Projects from Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine [BXJ201710]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long non-coding RNAs (IncRNAs) play crucial roles in the pathogenesis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Previously, we found that melittin treatment suppressed PDAC tumor growth. However, it is unclear whether IncRNAs have any role in the melittin-induced suppression of PDAC. In this study, we used microarray data to identify 844 IncRNAs that were significantly differentially expressed in response to melittin treatment. Of these IncRNAs, we focused on the IncRNA NONHSAT105177, which had about a 22-fold increase in expression with melittin treatment. We found that melittin treatment increased NONHSAT105177 expression in PDAC cell lines but not in normal pancreatic ductal epithelial cell line. NONHSAT105177 expression was significantly lower in PDAC cancer tissues than in adjacent noncancerous tissues. Additionally, overexpression of NONHSAT105177 inhibited PDAC cell proliferation, migration, and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), both in vitro and in vivo. Consistent with the mechanism of action of melittin, NONHSAT105177 significantly downregulated cholesterol pathway genes, including Clusterin (CLU). Moreover, we found that NONHSAT105177 trafficking was mediated by exosomes. The combined findings of our current and previous studies suggest that NONHSAT105177 mediated the melittin-induced inhibition of PDAC cell growth and metastasis, which indicated a potential target for developing new strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据