4.7 Article

Macropinocytosis and TAK1 mediate anti-inflammatory to pro-inflammatory macrophage differentiation by HIV-1 Nef

期刊

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cddis.2014.233

关键词

macrophages; macropinocytosis; TAK1; M-CSF; GM-CSF; Nef

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan
  2. Global COE program 'Global Education and Research Center Aiming at the Control of AIDS'

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Macrophages (M Phi) are functionally classified into two types, anti-inflammatory M2 and pro-inflammatory M1. Importantly, we recently revealed that soluble HIV-1 proteins, particularly the pathogenetic protein Nef, preferentially activate M2-M Phi and drive them towards an M1-like M Phi, which might explain the sustained immune activation seen in HIV-1-infected patients. Here, we show that the preferential effect of Nef on M2-M Phi is mediated by TAK1 (TGF-beta-activated kinase 1) and macropinocytosis. As with MAP kinases and NF-kappa B pathway, Nef markedly activated TAK1 in M-CSF-derived M2-M Phi but not in GM-CSF-derived M1-M Phi. Two Nef mutants, which were unable to activate MAP kinases and NF-kappa B pathway, failed to activate TAK1. Indeed, the TAK1 inhibitor 5Z-7-oxozeaenol as well as the ectopic expression of a dominant-negative mutant of TAK1 or TRAF2, an upstream molecule of TAK1, inhibited Nef-induced signaling activation and M1-like phenotypic differentiation of M2-M Phi. Meanwhile, the preferential effect of Nef on M2-M Phi correlated with the fact the Nef entered M2-M Phi more efficiently than M1-M Phi. Importantly, the macropinosome formation inhibitor EIPA completely blocked the internalization of Nef into M2-M Phi. Because the macropinocytosis activity of M2-M Phi was higher than that of M1-M Phi, our findings indicate that Nef enters M2-M Phi efficiently by exploiting their higher macropinocytosis activity and drives them towards M1-like M Phi by activating TAK1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据