4.7 Article

Bak apoptotic function is not directly regulated by phosphorylation

期刊

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cddis.2012.191

关键词

apoptosis; Bak phosphorylation; Bak activation; Bcl-2 proteins; isoelectric focusing; tyrosine phosphorylation

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [575559, 1016701, 637335]
  2. Association for International Cancer Research [10-230]
  3. Victorian State Government Operational Intrastructure Support
  4. Australian Government NHMRC IRIISS
  5. Worldwide Cancer Research [10-0230] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During apoptosis, Bak and Bax permeabilize the mitochondrial outer membrane by undergoing major conformational change and oligomerization. This activation process in Bak is reported to require dephosphorylation of tyrosine-108 close to an activation trigger site. To investigate how dephosphorylation of Bak contributes to its activation and conformational change, one-dimensional isoelectric focusing (1D-IEF) and mutagenesis was used to monitor Bak phosphorylation. On 1D-IEF, Bak extracted from a range of cell types migrated as a single band near the predicted isoelectric point of 5.6 both before and after phosphatase treatment, indicating that Bak is not significantly phosphorylated at any residue. In contrast, three engineered 'phosphotagged' Bak variants showed a second band at lower pI, indicating phosphorylation. Apoptosis induced by several stimuli failed to alter Bak pI, indicating little change in phosphorylation status. In addition, alanine substitution of tyrosine-108 and other putative phosphorylation sites failed to enhance Bak activation or pro-apoptotic function. In summary, Bak is not significantly phosphorylated at any residue, and Bak activation during apoptosis does not require dephosphorylation. Cell Death and Disease (2013) 4, e452; doi:10.1038/cddis.2012.191; published online 10 January 2013

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据