4.6 Article

Claudin-4 is required for AMPK-modulated paracellular permeability in submandibular gland cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY
卷 6, 期 6, 页码 486-497

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jmcb/mju048

关键词

AMP-activated protein kinase; claudin-4; tight junction; paracellular permeability; submandibular gland

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81100763, 81271161, 81442007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tight junction plays an important role in mediating paracellular permeability in epithelia. We previously found that activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) increased saliva secretion by modulating paracellular permeability in submandibular glands. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying AMPK-modulated paracellular permeability are unknown. In this study, we found that AICAR, an AMPK agonist, increased saliva secretion in the isolated rat submandibular glands, decreased transepithelial electrical resistance (TER), and increased 4 kDa FITC-dextran flux in cultured SMG-C6 cells. AICAR also induced redistribution of tight junction protein claudin-4, but not claudin-1, claudin-3, occludin, or ZO-1, from the cytoplasm to the membrane. Moreover, knockdown of claudin-4 by shRNA suppressed while claudin-4 re-expression restored the TER and 4 kDa FITC-dextran flux responses to AICAR. Additionally, AICAR increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation, and inhibition of ERK1/2 by U0126, an ERK1/2 kinase inhibitor, or by siRNA decreased AICAR-induced TER responses. AICAR induced the serine S199 phosphorylation of claudin-4 and enhanced the interaction of claudin-4 and occludin. Furthermore, pretreatment with U0126 significantly suppressed AMPK-modulated phosphorylation, redistribution, and interaction with occludin of claudin-4. Taken together, these results indicated that claudin-4 played a crucial role in AMPK-modulated paracellular permeability and ERK1/2 was required in AMPK-modulated tight junction barrier function in submandibular gland.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据