4.5 Article

Toward defining grade C pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome

期刊

HPB
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 589-593

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00486.x

关键词

pancreas; neoplasia; resection; morbidity; mortality; outcome

资金

  1. Herb Kosten Endowment Fund for Pancreatic Cancer Research and Care at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In 2005 the International Study Group for Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) created a definition and grading system for pancreatic fistulae (PF) in which grade C denotes the most severe and potentially life-threatening type. Factors and outcomes associated with grade C fistulae have been ill defined. Methods: Systematic searches of PubMed and EMBASE were conducted by two independent reviewers utilizing the keywords pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and pancreatic fistula. Inclusion criteria were: (i) a sample of =100 patients; (ii) consecutive accrual of all pathologies, and (iii) use of the ISGPF definition and grading system. Quality appraisal and data extraction were performed using pilot-tested templates. Results: Fourteen articles describing a total of 2706 PDs met the study entrance criteria. Pancreatic fistulae occurred in 479 patients (18%) and included 71 grade C PF that were directly responsible for 25 deaths (35% mortality rate). Only two studies analysed risk factors; these found soft pancreatic texture and histology other than adenocarcinoma to be the most common risk factors. Ten studies reported management strategies and indicated that 51% of patients required reoperation. Conclusions: Grade C PF: (i) accounts for 15% of fistulae following PD and has an associated mortality rate of 35%; (ii) occurs most commonly in pathology associated with a soft remnant, and (iii) requires reoperation in approximately one half of patients. The published literature incompletely describes grade C PF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据