4.3 Article

Investigation of the induction time for THF hydrate formation in porous media

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.03.030

关键词

THF hydrate; Induction time; Memory effect; Subcooling; Particle size

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51106018, 50736001, 51227005]
  2. Major National Science and Technology Programs of China [2011ZX05026-004]
  3. High-tech Research and Development Program of China [2006AA09A209-5, 2013AA09250302]
  4. Major State Basic Research Development Program of China [2011CB707304]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [DUT13LAB19]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The induction time of hydrate formation is an important parameter during gas exploitation, which allows secondary natural gas hydrates to form, and in the improvement of hydrate-based technologies. The effects of the memory effect, subcooling, and the particle size of the porous media on the induction time for tetrahydrofuran (THF) hydrate formation were investigated in this study. Six test tubes were used as reactors when forming the hydrates in porous media. The experimental results indicated that that the memory effect and the use of extreme sub-cooling as a strong driving force can reduce the induction time effectively. Extreme sub-cooling can strengthen the driving force for hydrate formation. The relationship between the induction time and subcooling is less pronounced when the THF hydrate forms from hydrate-dissociated water. The average induction time for the formation of the THF hydrate from hydrate-dissociated water was 27.5 min in BZ-06 when using a 3 mol % THF solution. The induction time can be controlled easily when the driving force increases to a threshold value. The average induction time decreases as the particle size increases. Porous media with larger particle sizes can control the induction time and reduce the stochastic nature of the induction time. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据