4.5 Article

Computational modeling of the effects of amyloid-beta on release probability at hippocampal synapses

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2013.00001

关键词

amyloid-beta; hippocampus; computational modeling; release probability; neuronal output

资金

  1. Alzheimer Association [NIRG-08-91170]
  2. Compagnia di San Paolo
  3. Italian Institute of Technology (IIT)
  4. FIRB

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of amyloid beta (A beta) in brain function and in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains elusive. Recent publications reported that an increase in A beta concentration perturbs presynaptic release in hippocampal neurons. In particular, it was shown in vitro that A beta is an endogenous regulator of synaptic transmission at the CA3-CA1 synapse, enhancing its release probability. How this synaptic modulator influences neuronal output during physiological stimulation patterns, such as those elicited in vivo, is still unknown. Using a realistic model of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons, we first implemented this A beta induced enhancement of release probability and validated the model by reproducing the experimental findings. We then demonstrated that this synaptic modification can significantly alter synaptic integration properties in a wide range of physiologically relevant input frequencies (from 5 to 200 Hz). Finally, we used natural input patterns, obtained from CA3 pyramidal neurons in vivo during free exploration of rats in an open field, to investigate the effects of enhanced A beta on synaptic release under physiological conditions. The model shows that the CA1 neuronal response to these natural patterns is altered in the increased-A beta condition, especially for frequencies in the theta and gamma ranges. These results suggest that the perturbation of release probability induced by increased A beta can significantly alter the spike probability of CA1 pyramidal neurons and thus contribute to abnormal hippocampal function during AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据