4.5 Article

A model for cortical rewiring following deafferentation and focal stroke

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/neuro.10.010.2009

关键词

lesion-induced plasticity; neuronal network model; homeostasis; structural plasticity; cortical remapping; synaptogenesis; axonal sprouting; neurological rehabilitation

资金

  1. German Ministry for Research and Education (BMBF) via the Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience (BCCN) Gottingen [01GQ0432]
  2. European PACO-Plus project
  3. Netherlands Organization for Research (NWO) [635.100.017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is still unclear to what extent structural plasticity in terms of synaptic rewiring is the cause for cortical remapping after a lesion. Recent two-photon laser imaging studies demonstrate that synaptic rewiring is persistent in the adult brain and is dramatically increased following brain lesions or after a loss of sensory input (cortical deafferentation). We use a recurrent neural network model to study the time course of synaptic rewiring following a peripheral lesion. For this, we represent axonal and dendritic elements of cortical neurons to model synapse formation, pruning and synaptic rewiring. Neurons increase and decrease the number of axonal and dendritic elements in an activity-dependent fashion in order to maintain their activity in a homeostatic equilibrium. In this study we demonstrate that synaptic rewiring contributes to neuronal homeostasis during normal development as well as following lesions. We show that networks in homeostasis, which can therefore be considered as adult networks, are much less able to compensate for a loss of input. Interestingly, we found that paused stimulation of the networks are much more effective promoting reorganization than continuous stimulation. This can be explained as neurons quickly adapt to this stimulation whereas pauses prevents a saturation of the positive stimulation effect. These findings may suggest strategies for improving therapies in neurologic rehabilitation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据