4.1 Review

Metabolic influences on neuroendocrine regulation of reproduction

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MED.0b013e32836318ce

关键词

hypothalamus; kisspeptin; leptin; metabolism; reproduction

资金

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) as part of the Specialized Cooperative Centers Program in Reproduction and Infertility Research [U54 HD28138]
  3. NIH/NICHD [R01 HD061577, R01 HD019938, R21 HD066495, K99 HD071970]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of reviewReproduction is a tightly regulated function in which many mechanisms contribute to ensure the survival of the species. Among those, due to the elevated energy requirements of reproduction, metabolic factors exert a pivotal role in the control of hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis. Although this control may occur at multiple levels of the axis, the majority of interactions between metabolic and reproductive systems take place in the hypothalamus. In this article, we present an overview of the state-of-the-art knowledge regarding the metabolic regulation of reproduction at the central level. We aim to identify the neuroanatomical location where both functions interconnect by discussing the likelihood of each component of the neuronal hierarchical network controlling gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) release to be first-order responders to metabolic cues, especially the peripheral metabolic signals leptin, insulin, and ghrelin.Recent findingsLatest evidence suggests that the primary action of leptin, insulin, and ghrelin to regulate reproduction is located upstream of the main central elicitors of gonadotropin release, Kiss1 and GnRH neurons, and neuroanatomically separated from their metabolic action.SummaryThe study of the neuronal interactions between the mechanisms governing metabolism and reproduction offers the platform to overcome or treat a number of prevailing metabolic and/or reproductive conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据