4.2 Article

Applications of Preference Assessment Procedures in Depression and Agitation Management in Elders with Dementia

期刊

CLINICAL GERONTOLOGIST
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 239-259

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/07317110902895226

关键词

dementia; preference assessments; depression; agitation management; long-term care

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH063982] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH063982, R01 MH063982-01A1] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Low levels of engagement with leisure activities are commonly seen in older adults with dementia and may lead to decreased social contact, depressed affect, and agitated behaviors. Adults with dementia often have difficulty choosing activities when asked directly about preferences due to cognitive decline, which makes it more difficult to increase their engagement levels. However, simply presenting leisure items without prior knowledge of preferences may be inefficient and may not yield desired results. Long-term care staff need more structured and efficient ways to determine individual preferences, and preference assessments (structured choice-making opportunities) may offer a solution. Preference assessments have been used to identify effective reinforcers both for individuals with developmental disabilities and for older adults with dementia and can provide staff with a brief method for identifying enjoyable activities. This study examines the utility of using stimuli (identified from preference assessments) in behavioral management protocols with 11 elders (mean age = 85.6 years) with dementia in a long-term care setting. Behavioral outcomes of depression and agitation were evaluated at baseline and throughout the intervention. Results indicated positive improvement in behavioral symptoms in 8 of 11 participants. The utility of using preferred items in behavioral management protocols was supported for reducing agitated behaviors but was only partially supported for decreasing depressive symptoms in individuals with dementia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据