4.5 Article

Practice environment, job satisfaction and burnout of critical care nurses in South Africa

期刊

JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 685-695

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01350.x

关键词

burnout; critical-care nurse; critical-care unit; job satisfaction; practice environments

资金

  1. Atlantic Philanthropies
  2. European Union [223468]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

klopper h.c., coetzee s.k., pretorius r. & bester p. (2012) Journal of Nursing Management similar to 20, 685695 Practice environment, job satisfaction and burnout of critical care nurses in South Africa Aim To describe the practice environment, job satisfaction and burnout of critical-care nurses (CCNs) in South Africa (SA) and the relationship between these variables. Background CCNs are more sensitive to job satisfaction and burnout, and several studies have been published on the relationship between these variables. However, the research that was undertaken did not focus exclusively on the practice environment of CCNs or the context of SA. Method The RN4CAST survey was used. A stratified sample of 55 private hospitals and seven national referral hospitals were included in the study. A total of 935 CCNs completed the survey. Results The practice environment is positive, except for staffing and resource adequacy, and governance. The greatest job dissatisfaction is experienced with regard to wages, opportunities for advancement and study leave. CCNs have a high degree of burnout. Conclusion The high degree of burnout is related to dissatisfaction with wages, opportunities for advancement, study leave and a practice environment with inadequate staffing and resources, and lack of nurse participation in hospital affairs. Implications for nursing management Managers should ensure that adequate numbers of CCNs are on the staff allocation and provide opportunities for CCNS to participate in policy and governance of the hospital, while giving attention to good salaries and providing opportunities for advancement and study leave.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据