4.1 Article

Noise of an overexpanded Mach 3.3 jet: non-linear propagation effects and correlations with flow

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AEROACOUSTICS
卷 13, 期 7-8, 页码 607-632

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1260/1475-472X.13.7-8.607

关键词

-

资金

  1. CNES (Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales)
  2. Institut du Developpement et des Ressources en Informatique Scientifique (IDRIS) [2012-020204]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The noise emitted by an overexpanded round jet at a Mach number of 3.3 and a Reynolds number of 10(5), computed in a previous study using large-eddy simulation (LES), is investigated. In a first step, the non-linear sound propagation effects are quantified by performing two far-field wave extrapolations from the LES near-field data. The extrapolations are carried out by solving the linearized Euler equations in one case and the full Euler equations in the other, without atmospheric absorption, up to a distance of 240 radii from the jet nozzle exit. The non-linear effects are shown to be quite significant, resulting in a series of N-shaped waves in the pressure signals, and in weaker mid-frequency components and stronger high-frequency components in the spectra. Close to the peak directivity radiation angle, for instance, they lead to about a 8 dB loss and a 6 dB gain at the Strouhal numbers of 0.2 and 1, respectively. In a second step, noise generation mechanisms are discussed by calculating correlations between far-field pressure fluctuations and turbulent quantities in the jet. High levels of correlation are found with the centerline flow fluctuations at the end of the potential core, with the shear-layer flow fluctuations over a large axial distance, and with the centerline density fluctuations between the 3rd and the 5th shock cells. They are attributed to the intermittent intrusion of low-speed vortical structures in the potential core, to the supersonic convection of turbulent structures, and to the shock motions at the screech tone frequency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据