4.6 Article

Bifunctional TiO2 underlayer for α-Fe2O3 nanorod based photoelectrochemical cells: enhanced interface and Ti4+ doping

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 3, 期 9, 页码 5007-5013

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ta06315e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Programs through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2012R1A6A3A04038530]
  2. Chonbuk National University
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A6A3A04038530] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A thin, compact TiO2 underlayer for hematite-based photoelectrochemical cells was prepared by simple spin coating and showed a dramatic increase in device performance and photocurrent density. The introduction of TiO2 underlayers induced a noticeable change in the nanostructure. In contrast to the conventional strategies based on underlayers, the compact TiO2 underlayers can act as both a charge recombination barrier and also as a source for titanium dopants. One could simply take advantage of fortuitous doping of Sn from FTO into hematite lattice during the activation step, and is converted into intentional doping of Ti4+ from the TiO2 underlayer into the hematite lattice. Ti4+ doping in hematite lattice is highly probable during the sintering of FTO/TiO2/alpha-Fe2O3 photoanodes at 800 degrees C, which has been confirmed by XPS measurements. Based on electrochemical studies, it is evident that the TiO2 underlayer effectively suppresses charge recombination at the FTO/alpha-Fe2O3 interface and provides possible Ti4+ doping apart from Sn diffusion from FTO substrates when sintered at high temperature (800 degrees C). In contrast, only charge recombination was suppressed at lower sintering temperature (550 degrees C). This is the first report on the elemental doping of Ti4+ from the TiO2 underlayer when sintered at high temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据