4.6 Article

High performance colored selective absorbers for architecturally integrated solar applications

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 3, 期 14, 页码 7353-7360

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ta00694e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Shanghai Science and Technology Foundation [12nm0502900, 13JC1405902]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61223006]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Architecturally integrated solar thermal technologies such as solar water heaters and solar thermoelectric generators (STEGs) rely on spectrally selective solar absorbers. These solar absorbers need to have simultaneous high solar absorptivity (a) and low thermal emissivity (3), which always makes them look dark blue or black and so blocks architectural integrated solar applications. A colorful appearance should be taken into account for integration into architectural applications. Herein, colored absorbers with a TiNxOy absorbing layer and a TiO2/Si3N4/SiO2 dielectric stack are elaborately designed and can be fabricated with only two targets, Ti and Si, by using reactive magnetron sputtering. Both the theoretical and experimental results show that the color can be tuned a huge amount, while keeping solar absorptivity higher than 95% and thermal emissivity lower than 5%. The highest absorptivity and energy efficiency (alpha/epsilon) values are 97.6% and 27.2, respectively. These materials can also be fabricated onto thermoelectric generators to demonstrate the conversion of solar energy into electricity. The open circuit voltage dramatically increases from 171 mV to 523 mV (3.1 times) when using the absorbers. Additionally, the colored solar absorbers can be deposited onto most types of substrate, even flexible substrates. They can simultaneously satisfy the aesthetic requirements and excellent energy performance required for architecturally integrated solar thermal and thermoelectric applications, as well as applications in other fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据