4.4 Article

Integrative revision of the giant pill-millipede genus Sphaeromimus from Madagascar, with the description of seven new species (Diplopoda, Sphaerotheriida, Arthrosphaeridae)

期刊

ZOOKEYS
卷 -, 期 414, 页码 67-107

出版社

PENSOFT PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.414.7730

关键词

COI; Barcoding; soil arthropods; microendemism; Andrahomana; Lavasoa; Sainte Luce; Manombo

类别

资金

  1. SYNTHESYS European Commission's (FP 6) Integrated Infrastructure Initiative programme [FR-TAF-1166]
  2. German Science Foundation [DFG WA-530 37-1]
  3. Field Museum Collections Fund
  4. NSF [DEB 05-29715]
  5. REU [DBI 08-49958]
  6. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1156594] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Malagasy giant pill-millipede genus Sphaeromimus de Saussure & Zehntner, 1902 is revised. Seven new species, S. titanus sp. n., S. vatovavy sp. n., S. lavasoa sp. n., S. andohahela sp. n., S. ivohibe sp. n., S. saintelucei sp. n., and S. andrahomana sp. n. were discovered, in one case with the help of sequence data, in the rainforests of southeastern Madagascar. The species are described using light-and scanning electron microscopy. A key to all 10 species of the genus is presented. All but one (S. andohahela) of the newly discovered species are microendemics each occurring in isolated forest fragments. The mitochondrial COI barcoding gene was amplified and sequenced for 18 Sphaeromimus specimens, and a dataset containing COI sequences of 28 specimens representing all Sphaeromimus species (except S. vatovavy) was analyzed. All species are genetically monophyletic. Interspecific uncorrected genetic distances were moderate (4-10%) to high (18-25%), whereas intraspecific variation is low (0-3.5%). Sequence data allowed the correct identification of three colour morphs of S. musicus, as well as the identity of a cave specimen, which although aberrant in its morphology and colouration, was genetically identical to the holotype of S. andrahoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据