4.2 Article

Atmospheric Heterogeneous Reactions of Benzo(a)pyrene

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1524/zpch.2010.6145

关键词

PAH; Reactivity; Benzo(a)pyrene; Nitrobenzo(a)pyrene; Ozone; Nitrogen Dioxide; Hydroxyl Radical; Atmospheric Particle; Silica; GC-MS

资金

  1. French National Research Agency
  2. Aquitaine Region

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This experimental study deals with heterogeneous reactions of benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) with ozone nitrogen dioxide and hydroxyl radicals BaP was adsorbed on silica particles chosen here as a model of mineral atmospheric particles Compound extractions were assisted by focused microwave and analyses were performed by gas chromatography coupled with mass spectroscopy in single ion monitoring mode Pseudo first order rate constants were obtained from the fit of experimental decays of particulate BaP concentration versus reaction time Second order rate constants were determined considering the different oxidant gaseous concentrations except for the case of hydroxyl radicals where only a pseudo first order rate constant was proposed Values obtained at room temperature are (2 1 +/- 0 5) X 10(-15) cm(3) molecule(-1) s(-1) (BaP + ozone) (5 8 +/- 1 4) X 10(-16) cm(3) molecule(-1) s(-1) for (BaP + nitrogen dioxide) and (3 4 +/- 0 8) X 10(-2) s(-1) for (BaP + OH) reactions Products have only been investigated for the NO2 and the OH (in the presence of NOx) reactions 1 3 and 6 nitrobenzo(a)pyrenes were detected as degradation products and quantified Reaction rate constants for product formation are (3 7 +/- 0 9) X 10(-16) cm(3) molecule(-1) s(-1) for 6 NBaP (2 2 +/- 0 6) X 10(-17) cm(3) molecule(-1) s(-1) for 1 NBaP and (5 3 +/- 1 3) X 10(-17) cm(3) molecule(-1) s(-1) for 3 NBaP 1 3 and 6 nitroBaP account respectively for approximately 5% 12% and 83% of total nitrated species If in the presence of only nitrogen dioxide BaP was totally degraded within few minutes only 20 to 25 % of the initial BaP led to nitrated compounds when reacting with OH (in the presence of NOx)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据