4.5 Article

Zinc Deficiency in Patients Undergoing Pancreatoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumors Is Associated with Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 35, 期 9, 页码 2110-2117

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-011-1170-z

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study was done to investigate the prevalence of zinc deficiency after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and its correlation with pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. Patients were included in this study if they had undergone PD for periampullary tumors without recurrence and had received follow-up for more than 6 months between February 2006 and June 2007. Serum levels of zinc, fasting glucose, albumin, and iron were obtained. The pancreatic exocrine function was evaluated by a fecal elastase-1 assay, stool fat assessment, and a pancreatic duct-parenchymal ratio (DPR) at the L1 level using abdominal computed tomography (CT). The quality of life was estimated with a questionnaire of EORTC QLQ-C30 and PAN26. All of these patients were then supplemented with oral pancreatic enzymes for 4 weeks to evaluate the effect of these enzymes on zinc deficiency. Forty-eight eligible patients, 27 men and 21 women, were included. The mean age was 61.3 +/- A 1.7 years. Thirty-three (68%) patients had a zinc deficiency with a mean zinc level of 72.3 +/- A 2.9 mcg/dl (normal range: 80-120 mcg/dl). Patients with lower serum zinc levels tended to have typical presentations of zinc deficiency (P = 0.039, chi(2)). The serum zinc level was significantly negatively correlated with pancreatic duct diameter, DPR, and positive stool fat during the late follow-up period. The most common presentations of patients with lower serum zinc levels were skin rash, photophobia, and glossitis. These gastrointestinal disorders, as well as symptoms of zinc deficiency, improved after pancreatic enzyme supplementation. Zinc deficiency after PD was a common phenomenon and correlated with pancreatic exocrine insufficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据