4.5 Article

Effect of photosynthetic bacteria on water quality and microbiota in grass carp culture

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 30, 期 9, 页码 2523-2531

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11274-014-1677-1

关键词

Photosynthetic bacteria; Water quality; Microbial community structure; Grass carp; 454-Pyrosequencing

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program, P. R. China (973 Program) [2009CB118705]
  2. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest [201203083]
  3. Nonprofit Technology and Application Research Program of Zhejiang Province [2013C32068]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate the effects of photosynthetic bacteria as additives on water quality, microbial community structure and diversity, a photosynthetic purple nonsulfur bacteria, Rhodopseudamonas palustris, was isolated and used to remove nitrogen in the aquaculture water. The results of water quality showed that the levels of ammonia nitrogen, nitrite nitrogen, total inorganic nitrogen and total nitrogen in the treatment group were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than the nitrogen levels of the controls in an extended range. A 454-pyrosequencing analysis revealed that at the level of phylum, Proteobacteria and Firmicutes were dominant in the control group respectively, compared to the dominance of the phyla Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria in the treatment group. The relative abundance of phyla Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria in treatment witnessed an increase than that in the control. The results also indicated that the treatment group enjoyed a higher microbial diversity than that of the control group. Based on the oxygen requirement and metabolism, the authors observed that the water supplementation with photosynthetic bacteria could significantly decrease (p < 0.05) the number of nitrite reducer and anaerobic bacteria. Therefore, the results suggested that adding photosynthetic bacteria to water improves the water quality as it changes the microbial community structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据