4.4 Article

Optimal Task Assignment in Mobile Cloud Computing by Queue Based Ant-Bee Algorithm

期刊

WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS
卷 104, 期 1, 页码 173-197

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-018-6014-9

关键词

Mobile cloud computing; Offloading; Queue model; Ant colony optimization; Artificial Bee Colony Optimization; Drop rate; Load balance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mobile cloud computing (MCC) broadens the mobile devices capability by offloading tasks to the cloud'. Hence, offloading numerous tasks simultaneously increases the cloudlets' load and augments the average completion duration of the offloaded tasks. To withstand this issue, we propose a hybrid Queue Ant Colony-Artificial Bee Colony Optimization (Ant-Bee) algorithm for optimal assignment of tasks in MCC environment. The proposed algorithm works on a two-way MCC model with offloading technique, that considers of both the cloudlets' and the public cloud'. The cloud' and the cloudlets' are designed on the basis of queue model for the estimation of clients waiting time in the limitation of resources. The major concern of the proposed algorithm is to offload the tasks by identifying the accurate place preferably in a cloud/cloudlet'. The cloud/cloudlet' is encompassed by a queue model with the end goal to minimize the drop rate by permitting the tasks to wait in the queue. It also aims for the optimal assignment of tasks to manage the cloudlets' load and to minimize the entire tasks average completion time. The performance of the proposed algorithm is analyzed with few Queue based conventional algorithms such as, Round Robin, Weighted Round Robin and Random. From the simulation result, it is analyzed that our proposed algorithm outperforms in the power consumption of the mobile devices, the average completion time of tasks, and drop rate. Also, to ensure the efficiency of our proposed hybrid QAnt-Bee algorithm, it is contrasted with the HACAS application scheduling algorithm, which fails to consider queue in the cloudlets'.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据