4.6 Article

Wind turbine boundary layer arrays for Cartesian and staggered configurations: Part II, low-dimensional representations via the proper orthogonal decomposition

期刊

WIND ENERGY
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 297-315

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/we.1719

关键词

atmospheric boundary layer; wind turbine array; wake recovery; turbulence; production; flux of kinetic energy; snapshot POD; low-dimensional model

资金

  1. National Science Foundation's BRIGE Program [ECCS-1032647]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cartesian and row-offset wind turbine array configurations were tested investigating the wake interaction and recovery dynamics. The snapshot proper orthogonal decomposition is applied to velocity measurements. Resulting modes are used in constructing low-dimensional descriptions of turbulence statistics including the turbulence kinetic energy production and the flux of turbulence kinetic energy. Descriptions of the turbulent behavior are made on the basis of the span of the streamwise average profile of the Reynolds shear stress, -(uv) over bar, with the addition of orthogonal modes. The Reynolds stress criterion was selected for the convergence of the model as it is a good representation of the range of turbulent dynamics in the wake of a wind turbine. The description demonstrates that the turbulence kinetic energy production and the flux of turbulence kinetic energy are accurately rebuilt with approximately 1% of the total resultant orthogonal modes. Structures associated with the top-tip of the rotor blade reconstruct with fewer modes than those associated with the bottom-tip of the rotor or the nacelle. This confirms that the greatest part of the turbulence kinetic energy is located high in the turbine canopy as described by the turbulent stresses. Overall, behavior of individual turbines in recovered positions within the arrays requires fewer modes to converge than those in locations with less recovered inflows. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据