4.4 Article

The Potential Global Distribution of Tall Buttercup (Ranunculus acris ssp acris): Opposing Effects of Irrigation and Climate Change

期刊

WEED SCIENCE
卷 61, 期 2, 页码 230-238

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1614/WS-D-12-00106.1

关键词

Animal health; climate change; CLIMEX; giant buttercup; meadow buttercup; tall buttercup; weed invasion

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Innovation, New Zealand, as part of Undermining Weeds [C10X0811]
  2. New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE) [C10X0811] Funding Source: New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tall buttercup, a native of central and northern Europe, has become naturalized in the United States and Canada, and in South Africa, Tasmania and New Zealand. In Canada and New Zealand it has become an economically significant weed in cattle-grazed pastures. In this study we develop a CLIMEX model for tall buttercup and use it to project the weed's potential distribution under current and future climates and in the presence and absence of irrigation. There was close concordance between the model's projection of suitable climate and recorded observations of the species. The projection was highly sensitive to irrigation; the area of potentially suitable land globally increasing by 30% (from 34 to 45 million km(2)) under current climate when a top-up irrigation regime (rainfall topped up 4 mm d(-1). on irrigable land), was included in the model. Most of the area that becomes suitable under irrigation is located in central Asia and central North America. By contrast, climate change is projected to have the opposite effect; the potential global distribution diminishing by 18% (from 34 to 28 million km(2)). This range contraction was the net result of a northward expansion in the northern limit for the species in Canada and the Russian Federation, and a relatively larger increase in the land area becoming unsuitable mainly in central Asia and south eastern United States.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据