4.7 Article

Identification of a core set of rhizobial infection genes using data from single cell-types

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00575

关键词

infection threads; methoxychalcone; medicarpin; CCAAT-box; infection zone; nod genes; Nod factors; nodulation

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/G023832/1, BB/L010305/1]
  2. John Innes Foundation
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L010305/1, BB/G023832/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1506763] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. BBSRC [BB/G023832/1, BB/L010305/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genome-wide expression studies on nodulation have varied in their scale from entire root systems to dissected nodules or root sections containing nodule primordia (NP). More recently efforts have focused on developing methods for isolation of root hairs from infected plants and the application of laser-capture microdissection technology to nodules. Here we analyze two published data sets to identify a core set of infection genes that are expressed in the nodule and in root hairs during infection. Among the genes identified were those encoding phenylpropanoid biosynthesis enzymes including Chalcone-O-Methyltransferase which is required for the production of the potent Nod gene inducer 4',4-dihydroxy-2-methoxychalcone. A promoter-GUS analysis in transgenic hairy roots for two genes encoding Chalcone-O-Methyltransferase isoforms revealed their expression in rhizobially infected root hairs and the nodule infection zone but not in the nitrogen fixation zone. We also describe a group of Rhizobially Induced Peroxidases whose expression overlaps with the production of superoxide in rhizobially infected root hairs and in nodules and roots. Finally, we identify a cohort of co-regulated transcription factors as candidate regulators of these processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据