4.7 Review

The green seaweed Ulva: a model system to study morphogenesis

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00072

关键词

algal genetics; chlorophyta; green tides; holobiont; multicellular organism; model organism

资金

  1. German Research Foundation - Excellence Initiative (JSMC)
  2. Collaborative Research Centre 1127 Chemical Mediators in complex Biosystems
  3. Royal Society-Leverhulme Trust Senior Research Fellowship
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/K020552/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/J014370/2, NE/J014370/1, NBAF010002] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. BBSRC [BB/K020552/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. NERC [NBAF010002, NE/J014370/1, NE/J014370/2] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Green macroalgae, mostly represented by the Ulvophyceae, the main multicellular branch of the Chlorophyceae, constitute important primary producers of marine and brackish coastal ecosystems. Ulva or sea lettuce species are some of the most abundant representatives, being ubiquitous in coastal benthic communities around the world. Nonetheless the genus also remains largely understudied. This review highlights Ulva as an exciting novel model organism for studies of algal growth, development and morphogenesis as well as mutualistic interactions. The key reasons that Ulva is potentially such a good model system are: (i) patterns of Ulva development can drive ecologically important events, such as the increasing number of green tides observed worldwide as a result of eutrophication of coastal waters, (ii) Ulva growth is symbiotic, with proper development requiring close association with bacterial epiphytes, (iii) Ulva is extremely developmentally plastic, which can shed light on the transition from simple to complex multicellularity and (iv) Ulva will provide additional information about the evolution of the green lineage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据