4.8 Article

Bacterial communities in a bioelectrochemical denitrification system: The effects of supplemental electron acceptors

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 51, 期 -, 页码 25-36

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.12.023

关键词

Bioelectrochemical system; Nitrate; Denitrification; Biocathode; Pyrosequencing

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0003940, 2012R1A1A 2042031]
  2. Korea Ministry of Environment [GT-11-B-02-003-3]
  3. Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) [GT-11-B-02-003-3] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0003940] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrochemical treatment of nitrate (NO3-), nitrite (NO2-) and mixtures of nitrate and nitrite was evaluated with microbial catalysts on a cathode in three different bioelectrochemical denitrification systems (BEDS). The removal rates and removal percentage of nitrogen (N) compounds varied during biotic and abiotic operations. The biotic cathode using NO3--N as an electron acceptor showed enhanced removal percentages (88%) compared to the operation with NO2--N (85%). The simultaneous reduction of NO3- and NO2- occurred in the operation with a mixture of N compounds. The bacterial diversity from the initial inoculum (return sludge) changed at the end of bioelectrochemical denitrification operation after 55 days. The microbial community composition was different depending on the type of electron acceptor. BEDS operation with NO3- and NO2- was enriched with Proteobacteria and Firmicutes respectively. BEDS with a mixture of N electron acceptors showed enrichment with Proteobacteria. There was no clear, distinct microbial community between the cathode biofilm and suspended biomass. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据