4.8 Article

Bioaccumulation and biomarker responses of cubic and octahedral Cu2O micro/nanocrystals in Daphnia magna

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 18, 页码 5981-5988

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.08.019

关键词

Nanotoxicity; Cuprous oxide; Crystallographies; Metallothionein; Daphnia magna

资金

  1. China's National Basic Research Program: Water environmental quality evolution and water quality criteria in lakes [2008CB418201]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [40871215, 21077136]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Great progress has been made in the controlled fabrication of nanomaterials with given sizes, shapes, and geometries. However, how such changes in structure potentially affect the bioavailability and toxicity of metal nanoparticles to aquatic organisms remains mostly unknown. The present study reports the different behaviors of two types of Cu2O micro/nanocrystals (micro/nano-Cu2O) with different shapes (cubic and octahedral) and crystallographies (with exposed surfaces as {100} or {111}). The bioaccumulation, median lethal concentration, and biomarker responses of Daphnia magna exposed to the two micro/nanocrystals are also investigated. The Cu accumulation, production of metallothionein (MT), and inhibition ratio of D. magna increased gradually with increasing micro/nano-Cu2O concentration. The two crystals showed slight Cu accumulation differences toward D. magna, and their biomarker responses and toxicities to D. magna differed significantly as well. The octahedral Cu2O micro/nanocrystals were more toxic to D. magna compared with the cubic micro/nanocrystals probably because of the higher surface activities of the {111} facets compared with those of the {100} facets for cuprites. Food ingestion was the main entry pathway of the micro/nanocrystals into organisms, and toxicity was consequently determined based on the dissolution behavior of the micro/nanocrystals in vivo. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据