4.8 Article

Disinfection of domestic effluents by gamma radiation: Effects on the inactivation of Ascaris lumbricoides eggs

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 17, 页码 5523-5528

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.008

关键词

Disinfection; Gamma radiation; Wastewater; Inactivation; Eggs Ascaris lumbricoides; Viability

资金

  1. Centro de Tecnologia de Desenvolvimento Nuclear - CDTN
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico - CNPq
  3. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos - FINEP (PROSAB)
  4. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa de Minas Gerais - FAPEMIG [14.107]
  5. Instituto de Analises Clinicas Hermes Pardini
  6. Pro-Reitoria de Pesquisa da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG
  7. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Department of Parasitology and Department of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work investigated the inactivation of Ascaris lumbricoides eggs in domestic effluents by gamma radiation from a Co-60 source. Domestic wastewater was treated in a compact demo-scale system consisting of a UASB reactor and a trickling filter; treatment was carried out at the Center for Research and Training on Sanitation (CePTS), Federal University of Minas Gerais, in Belo Horizonte-MG, Brazil. One-liter of treated wastewater samples was artificially contaminated with an average of 1000 non-embryonated Ascaris lumbricoides eggs from human feces; samples were then irradiated in a multiple-purpose irradiator at different doses (0.5-5 kGy). Eggs were recovered from the wastewater and the viability of these irradiated eggs was evaluated; the description of the egg developmental phases with each dose of gamma radiation was recorded. Radiation doses of 3.5 kGy effectively disinfected effluents with lower concentrations of A. lumbricoides eggs; higher radiation doses of 5 kGy were necessary to disinfect effluents with higher eggs concentrations. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据