4.6 Article

Effects of Irradiation Intensity and pH on Nutrients Release and Solids Destruction of Waste Activated Sludge Using the Microwave-Enhanced Advanced Oxidation Process

期刊

WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH
卷 82, 期 11, 页码 2229-2238

出版社

WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION
DOI: 10.2175/106143010X12681059116419

关键词

advanced oxidation process; microwave; particle size; wastewater sludge; nutrients release; solids destruction; dewaterability; particle size

资金

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Ottawa, Ontario)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using the microwave-enhanced advanced oxidation process (MW/H(2)O(2)-AOP), the pH and irradiation intensity on waste activated sludge samples were investigated to provide insight to the athermal effects on nutrients release, solids destruction, particle size distribution and dewaterability, and to demonstrate their interrelationships. Carbonaceous matters and nutrients released into solution depended on the irradiation intensity and time. Higher irradiation levels tended to be more effective in the solubilization of nutrients and had more pronounced effects in the dewaterability of sludge. In terms of particle size distribution, detectable particles increased in size for treatments in acidic conditions, while the dewaterability of treated sludge was improved. In treatments under neutral and alkaline conditions, the particle size range increased, with more small particles formed, thereby significantly deteriorating the dewaterability of sludge treated in alkaline conditions. The best results for the solubilization of nutrients were in alkaline conditions with high irradiation power, but dewaterability of the sludge was compromised. Sludge treatment with the MW/H(2)O(2)-AOP in acidic conditions with high irradiation power yielded the best dewaterable sludge and significant nutrient solubilization; therefore, it is the recommended treatment condition for activated sludge. Water Environ. Res., 82, 2229 (2010).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据