4.5 Article

GM-CSF fused with GP3 and GP5 of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus increased the immune responses and protective efficacy against virulent PRRSV challenge

期刊

VIRUS RESEARCH
卷 143, 期 1, 页码 24-32

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2009.02.017

关键词

GM-CSF; PRRSV; GP3; GP5; Immune responses

类别

资金

  1. National Key Technology RD Program [2007BAD86B02, 2007BAD86B03]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation [30871868, 30471288]
  3. Jiangsu Province Key Technology RD Program [BE2007342]
  4. Ministry of Education [20060307012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) has recently caused catastrophic losses in swine industry worldwide. Current vaccination strategies only provide a limited protection against PRRSV infection. This study was aimed to construct the recombinant adenovirus co-expressing GP3 and GP5 of highly pathogenic PRRSV fused with swine granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (rAd-GF35), and to detect the immune response in mice and pigs. The results showed that the rAd-GF35 could induce significantly higher PRRSV-specific neutralizing antibodies than the recombinant adenovirus only expressing GP3 and GP5 (rAd-GP35). Moreover, the fusion of GM-CSF markedly increased the secretion of IFN-gamma and IL-4 in PRRSV-stimulated mice lymphocytes culture and pigs sera. Following challenge with PRRSV, piglets inoculated with recombinant rAd-GF35 had lighter clinical signs, lower viremia and less gross lesion of lungs, as compared to that of rAd-GP35 immunized group. It demonstrated that GM-CSF fused with GP3 and GP5 of PRRSV could significantly enhance the humoral and cellular immune responses and provide protection against PRRSV challenge in pigs. The recombinant adenovirus rAd-GF35 might be an attractive candidate vaccine for the prevention and control of highly pathogenic PRRSV infection. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据