4.4 Article

Efficient magnetic bead-based separation of HIV-1-infected cells using an improved reporter virus system reveals that p53 up-regulation occurs exclusively in the virus-expressing cell population

期刊

VIROLOGY
卷 393, 期 1, 页码 160-167

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2009.07.009

关键词

HIV-1; Magnetic beads; Purification; p53; Apoptosis; Primary CD4 T lymphocyte

类别

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [HOP-67259, MOP-14438, MOP-79542, MOP-84555]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HIV-1 infection in cell lines is very efficient, since the target population is clonal and highly dividing. However, infection of primary cells such as CD4 T lymphocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages is much more difficult, resulting in a very small percentage of infected cells. In order to study events occurring in productively infected primary cells, we determined that a way to isolate this population from bystander cells was needed. We engineered a novel HIV-1-based reporter virus called NL4-3-IRES-HSA that allows for the magnetic separation of cells infected with fully competent virions. This X4-using virus encodes for the heat-table antigen (HSA/murine CD24) without the deletion of any viral genes by introducing an IRES sequence between HSA and the auxiliary gene Nef. Using commercial magnetic beads, we achieved efficient purification of HIV-1-infected cells (i.e. purity >85% and recovery >90%) from diverse primary cell types at early time points following infection. We used this system to accurately quantify p53 protein levels in both virus-infected and uninfected bystander primary CD4(+) T cells. We show that p53 up-regulation occurs exclusively in the infected population. We devised a strategy that allows for an efficient separation of HIV-1 infected cells from bystanders. We believe that this new reporter virus system will be of great help to study in depth how HIV-1 interacts with its host in a primary cells context. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据