4.4 Article

Generation of monoclonal antibody that distinguishes PrPSc from PrPC and neutralizes prion infectivity

期刊

VIROLOGY
卷 394, 期 2, 页码 200-207

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2009.08.025

关键词

Prion; Transmissible spongiform encephalopathy; Monoclonal antibody; Peptide phage display; Infectivity

类别

资金

  1. global COE Program [F-001]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan [18208026, 20658070]
  3. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan [20330701]
  4. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan
  5. grant for Strategic Cooperation to Control Emerging and Re-emerging Infections
  6. Program of Founding Research Centers for Emerging and Reemerging Infectious Diseases
  7. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18208026, 20658070] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To establish PrPSc-specific mAbs, we immunized Pmp(-/-) mice with PrPSc purified from prion-infected mice. Using this approach, we obtained mAb 6H10, which reacted with PrPSc treated with proteinase K, but not with PrPSc pretreated with more than 3 M GdnHCl. In contrast, reactivity of pan-PrP mAbs increased with increasing concentrations of GdnHCl used for pretreatment of PrPSc. In histoblot analysis, mAb 6H10 showed a positive reaction on a non-denatured histoblot but reactivity was lower when the histoblot was pretreated by autoclaving. Epitope analysis suggested that the extreme C-terminus of PrP is likely to be part of the epitope for mAb 6H10. MAb 6H10 immunoprecipitated PrPSc from brains of mice, sheep, and cattle infected with prions. Furthermore, pretreatment of purified PrPSc with mAb 6H10 reduced the infectious titer more than 1 log. Taken together, these results suggest that mAb 6H10 recognizes a conformational epitope on PrPSc that is related to prion infectivity. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据