4.1 Article

Differential In Vivo Clearance and Response to Secondary Heterologous Infections by H2(b)-Restricted Dengue Virus-Specific CD8(+) T Cells

期刊

VIRAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 477-485

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC
DOI: 10.1089/vim.2010.0034

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [U19 AI057319]
  2. Diabetes Endocrinology Research Center (DERC), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [DK32520]
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [U19AI057319] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [P30DK032520] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) are hypothesized to play a role in clearance during primary dengue virus (DENV) infections, and contribute to immunopathology during secondary heterologous infections in humans. We previously reported skewed T-cell responses to secondary DENV infection in BALB/c (H-2(d)) mice, reproducing characteristics of human DENV infection. To set the stage for using widely available transgenic and knockout mice, we extended these studies to identify DENV-specific T-cell responses in C57BL/6 (H-2(b)) mice. We identified dominant CD8(+) T-cell responses to H-2D(b)-restricted epitopes on the DENV NS4a (aa 249-265) and NS5 (aa 521-537) proteins. High frequencies of IFN-gamma- and TNF-alpha-producing T cells directed at both epitopes were detected following primary infection with all four DENV serotypes, and were augmented by secondary DENV infections. In vivo cytotoxicity assays demonstrated rapid clearance of target cells pulsed with the NS4a peptide; in contrast, NS5 peptide-pulsed target cells were poorly cleared in vivo. These data characterize two H2(b)-restricted T-cell epitopes displaying divergent in vivo function. These results should facilitate further studies of the in vivo effects of DENV-specific T cells, including the use of genetically modified mouse strains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据