4.5 Article

Prevalence and risk factors associated with Sarcocystis neurona infections in opossums (Didelphis virginiana) from central California

期刊

VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY
卷 166, 期 1-2, 页码 8-14

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.08.013

关键词

Sarcocystis neurona; Opossum; Didelphis virginiana; Sporocysts; Prevalence; Risk factors; California

资金

  1. Moss Foundation
  2. Morris Animal Foundation [D06ZO-417]
  3. National Science Foundation [0525765]
  4. UC Davis Center for Equine Health
  5. UC Davis Wildlife Health Center
  6. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  7. Directorate For Geosciences [0525765] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sarcocystis neurona, a protozoal parasite shed by opossums (Didelphis virginiana), has been shown to cause significant morbidity and mortality in horses, sea otters, and other marine mammals. Over the course of 3 years (fall 2005-summer 2008), opossums from central California were tested for infection with S. neurona. Of 288 opossums sampled, 17 (5.9%) were infected with S. neurona based on the molecular characterization of sporocysts from intestinal scrapings or feces. Risk factors evaluated for association with S. neurona infection in opossums included: age, sex, location, season, presence of pouch young in females, concomitant infection, and sampling method (live-trapped or traffic-killed). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that opossums in the Central Valley were 9 times more likely to be infected than those near the coast (p = 0.009). Similarly, opossum infection was 5 times more likely to be detected during the reproductive season (March-July; p = 0.013). This first investigation of S. neurona infection prevalence and associated risk factors in opossums in the western United States can be used to develop management strategies aimed at reducing the incidence of S. neurona infections in susceptible hosts, including horses and threatened California sea otters (Enhydra lutris nerles). (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据