4.2 Article

Changing Geographic Distribution of Japanese Encephalitis Virus Genotypes, 1935-2017

期刊

VECTOR-BORNE AND ZOONOTIC DISEASES
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 35-44

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2018.2291

关键词

Japanese encephalitis; Japanese encephalitis virus; genotype

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81501757, 81301479]
  2. National key research and development project [2016YFC1201904, 2016YFC1200905, 2017YFC1200503]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control [2014SKLID103, 2015SKLID505]
  4. Open Research Fund Program of CAS Key Laboratory of Special Pathogens and Biosafety, Wuhan Institute of Virology - Open Research Fund Program of Wuhan National Bio-Safety Level 4 Lab of CAS [2017SPCAS003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is a representative virus of the JEV serogroup in genus Flavivirus, family Flaviviridae. JEV is a mosquito-borne virus that causes Japanese encephalitis (JE), one of the most severe viral encephalitis diseases in the world. JEV is divided into five genotypes (G1-G5), and each genotype has its own distribution pattern. However, the distribution of different JEV genotypes has changed markedly in recent years. JEV G1 has replaced G3 as the dominant genotype in the traditional epidemic areas in Asia, while G3 has spread from Asia to Europe and Africa and caused domestic JE cases in Africa. G2 and G5, which were endemic in Malaysia, exhibited great geographical changes as well. G2 migrated southward and led to prevalence of JE in Australia, while G5 emerged in China and South Korea after decades of silence. Along with these changes, JE occurred in some non-traditional epidemic regions as an emerging infectious disease. The regional changes in JEV pose a great threat to human health, leading to huge disease burdens. Therefore, it is of great importance to strengthen the monitoring of JEV as well as virus genotypes, especially in non-traditional epidemic areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据