4.6 Article

A Longitudinal Evaluation of Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients with Parkinson's Disease

期刊

VALUE IN HEALTH
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 392-396

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00430.x

关键词

longitudinal; nonmotor symptoms; Parkinson's disease; predictors; quality of life

资金

  1. Fonds NutsOhra
  2. van Alkemade-Keuls Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Few longitudinal studies have evaluated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in Parkinson's disease (PD) and these studies have not evaluated all potentially relevant domains of PD. Our objective was to identify domains at baseline that predict change in HRQoL, and to evaluate the relation between change in HRQoL and change in particular domains of PD. A total of 336 patients who participated in the longitudinal SCOPA-PROPARK cohort study and had data from the first and third annual evaluation were included in this study. The Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's disease (SCOPA) evaluation was used to assess impairments and disabilities. HRQoL was assessed with the EuroQol-5D visual analogue scale. Multiple linear regression analysis with change in HRQoL as dependent variable was used to identify factors that influence the change in HRQoL. Health-related quality of life as well as most impairment and disability domains decreased significantly from baseline to follow-up. The two regression models of change in HRQoL, adjusted for baseline HRQoL, included 1) the baseline domains autonomic dysfunction, nighttime sleep problems, and cognitive function, and 2) change in psychosocial problems, change in depressive symptoms, and change in cognitive function. Patients who have autonomic dysfunction, nighttime sleep problems, and cognitive dysfunction are at risk for deterioration in HRQoL. Deterioration in HRQoL over 2-year time was associated with worsening in psychosocial well-being, mood, and cognitive function. Interventions aiming to improve these domains are important and would likely contribute to improvement in HRQoL, although more research is necessary.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据