4.5 Article

The impact of key amino acid substitutions in the hemagglutinin of influenza A (H3N2) viruses on vaccine production and antibody response

期刊

VACCINE
卷 28, 期 24, 页码 4079-4085

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.03.078

关键词

Influenza H3N2 virus; Hemagglutinin; Egg adaptation; Antigenicity; Immunogenicity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Influenza H3N2 viruses have recently drifted from A/Wisconsin/67/05-like to A/Brisbane/10/07-like viruses. The effect of key amino acid substitutions in the hemagglutinin (HA) protein on the replication, antigenicity and immunogenicity of cold-adapted, live attenuated vaccine strains was examined. A/Brisbane/10/07 egg isolate contained a unique combination of G186 and P194 which were required for efficient virus growth in Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells and embryonated chicken eggs, but the virus induced low level of serum antibody response in ferrets. Substitution of the G186 and P194 in the HA of A/Brisbane/10/07 by V186 and L194 that were present in the HA of A/Wisconsin/67/05-like viruses significantly impaired virus replication but greatly improved the immunogenicity of the vaccine virus to a level comparable to that elicited by the A/Wisconsin/67/05 vaccine. The replication of the variants with impaired growth could be improved by amino acid substitutions at the 195 or 226 residues. The viruses with the G186 and P194 residues were antigenically distinct from the viruses with V186 and L194. Sequence analysis of the HA sequences of the H3N2 viruses from the database and sequencing of the HA gene of a cell-derived A/Brisbane/10/07-like virus before and after egg passage indicated that the P194 residue was most likely derived from egg adaptation. Our results demonstrated the importance of careful evaluation of vaccine strains to ensure that the selected vaccines not only replicate well in eggs. but also retain their antigenicity and are immunogenic in the host. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据