4.5 Article

Bacterially expressed recombinant envelope protein domain III of Japanese encephalitis virus (rJEV-DIII) elicits Th1 type of immune response in BALB/c mice

期刊

VACCINE
卷 27, 期 49, 页码 6905-6909

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.09.006

关键词

Japanese encephalitis virus envelope protein domain III; Neutralizing antibody; Antibody isotyping; Cytokine profiling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Japanese encephalitis is a major cause of encephalitis in Asia. Cases occur largely in rural areas of the South and East Asian region resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Multiple vaccines exist to control Japanese encephalitis, but all suffer from problems. Envelope protein domain III of Japanese encephalitis virus is involved in binding to host receptors and it contains specific epitopes that elicit virus-neutralizing antibodies. Earlier, the protective efficacy of domain III has been evaluated in mice by some researchers, but these studies are lacking in explanation of humoral and cellular immune responses. We have earlier reported cloning, expression, purification and in vitro refolding of Japanese encephalitis virus envelope protein domain III (rJEV-DIII). Ninety percent JEV is neutralized when the serum against refolded rJEV-DIII is used at a dilution of 1:80. In the present study, we have evaluated the immunomodulatory potential of refolded rJEV-DIII protein in BALB/c mice with Freunds complete/incomplete adjuvants. Mice were tested for humoral immune response by ELISA. Cell-mediated immune response was tested by lymphocyte proliferation assay and cytokine profiling. The rJEV-DIII generated high IgG antibody and its isotypes (IgG2a and IgG3) and induced significant expression of INF-gamma and IL-2 cytokines. The rJEV-DIII induced significant lymphoproliferation of splenocytes. In conclusion rJEV-DIII induced Th1 type of immune response which plays an important role in protection for intracellular pathogens. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据