4.4 Article

Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Induces Cellular Reactive Oxygen Species and Lipid Peroxidation in Cancer Cells

期刊

UROLOGY
卷 79, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.01.017

关键词

-

资金

  1. BMRC [BMRC/04/1/21/19/311]
  2. Department of Surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE To determine whether Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) and/or BCG-soluble factors could modulate cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) in human bladder cancer cells and the impact this could have on response to therapy. METHODS The expression of alpha 5 beta 1 integrins on human bladder cancer cell lines and their ability to internalize BCG were determined. The effect of live and lyophilized BCG on cellular ROS, lipid peroxidation, and DNA damage was determined using H2DCF-DA, TBARS, and comet assays. The cytotoxic effects of live and lyophilized BCG on cancer cells were determined after 24 hours. ROS modulation by Antigen 85B and mycobacterial protein tyrosine phosphatases was monitored. RESULTS Live and lyophilized BCG were internalized to a similar extent, but live BCG increased cellular ROS, whereas lyophilized BCG reduced ROS. High ROS levels correlated with increased lipid peroxidation. The cytotoxic effect of BCG was independent of cellular ROS but dependent on internalization. Lyophilized BCG was more cytotoxic to bladder cancer cells than live BCG. BCG soluble factors such as Antigen85B could increase cellular ROS. Internalization of lyophilized BCG abrogated the ROS, and lipid peroxidation increase induced by BCG soluble factors. Both live and lyophilized BCG induced DNA damage but to different extents. CONCLUSION The end products of ROS, such as lipid peroxides and superoxide, could induce DNA damage, which could lead to mutations in cancer cells that select for their survival. Reducing BCG instillations may reduce the risk of mutational changes occurring in remnant cancer cells. UROLOGY 79: 1411.e15-1411.e20, 2012. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据