4.4 Article

The Effects of Sacral Acupuncture on Acetic Acid-induced Bladder Irritation in Conscious Rats

期刊

UROLOGY
卷 75, 期 3, 页码 730-734

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.04.025

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES To investigate the effects of sacral acupuncture on acetic acid-induced bladder irritation using cystometry in conscious rats, with particular focus on effects on afferent fibers of the bladder. METHODS A total of 40 female Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 200-270 g were used. The animals were divided into 5 groups: (1) rats with bladder overactivity induced by acetic acid, without sacral acupuncture stimulation (irritated bladder group); (2) rats treated with sacral acupuncture stimulation after induction of bladder overactivity by acetic acid (acupuncture stimulation group); (3) rats treated with sacral acupuncture stimulation after capsaicin desensitization (capsaicin-desensitized group); (4) rats treated with atropine (atropine injection group); and (5) rats treated with sacral acupuncture stimulation after nonacetic acid infusion (nonirritated bladder group). Cystometry was carried out without anesthesia, and the following variables were measured in all animals: intercontraction interval (ICI), basal pressure, threshold pressure, and micturition pressure. RESULTS In the acupuncture stimulation group, sacral acupuncture stimulation resulted in a 140.1 +/- 5.9% increase in ICI after acetic acid-induced irritation to an interval similar to baseline (P = .072). A significant difference in the percent of ICI increase was observed between the acupuncture stimulation and irritated bladder groups (P < .01). In the capsaicin-desensitized groups and acupuncture stimulation groups, no significant differences in ICI occurred, before and after acupuncture. CONCLUSIONS Sacral acupuncture could contribute to improve acetic acid-induced bladder irritation through inhibition of capsaicin-sensitive C-fiber activation. UROLOGY 75: 730-734, 2010. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据