4.4 Article

Urinary nerve growth factor levels are increased in patients with bladder outlet obstruction with overactive bladder symptoms and reduced after successful medical treatment

期刊

UROLOGY
卷 72, 期 1, 页码 104-108

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.01.069

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES Urinary nerve growth factor (NGF) levels have been shown to be increased in patients with symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB). This study was designed to measure the urinary NGF levels in patients with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) with or without OAB and to determine whether urinary NGF can serve as a biomarker for OAB. METHODS Urinary NGF levels were measured in 38 male control subjects without lower urinary tract symptoms and 153 patients with BOO. The diagnosis of BOO was further classified as BOO/ non-OAB (n = 21), BOO/OAB (n = 25), BOO with urodynamically confirmed detrusor overactivity (BOO/DO, n = 47), and BOO/OAB in patients who had received successful medical treatment (n = 60). The urinary NGF levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and compared among the different groups. The total urinary NGF levels were normalized to the concentration of the urinary creatinine (NGF/Cr) level. RESULTS The urinary NGF/Cr levels were very low in the control group (mean +/- standard error 0.005 +/- 0.003) and in patients with BOO/non-OAB (0.017 +/- 0.009) and significantly greater in patients with BOO/OAB (0.81 +/- 0.31) and BOO/DO (0.80 +/- 0.13). The urinary NGF/Cr levels were not significantly different between the BOO/OAB and BOO/DO groups; however, the urinary NGF/Cr levels returned to normal levels (0.059 +/- 0.021) after successful relief of OAB symptoms with medical treatment. CONCLUSIONS In our study, patients with BOO/OAB or BOO/DO had significantly greater urinary NGF/Cr levels compared with controls. These levels decreased to normal after successful relief of CAB symptoms. These results suggest that urinary NGF could be a potential biomarker for BOO with symptoms of OAB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据