3.9 Editorial Material

Reflections on the etiology of structural birth defects: Established teratogens and risk factors

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bdra.23392

关键词

congenital structural defects; malformations; birth defects; teratogens; risk factors; etiology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundVarious experts in clinical teratology have proposed what they consider to be well-established teratogens. With the recent growth in the number of resources and investigations, there has been a notable proliferation of proposed risk factors as potential causes of human congenital structural defects. The purpose of this Commentary is to provide a concise summary of the current state of knowledge regarding known causes and environmental risk factors of structural defects. MethodsWe performed a comprehensive search of PubMed for papers in English and in humans only, 2010 to 2014, that included birth defects, risk factors, and teratogens as key terms. ResultsOur search led to over 9000 papers dealing with these categories. From this, we were able to construct a timetable documenting the recognition of human teratogens and list several proposed environmental risk factors. Three relevant current trends were noticed: An increase of prescription and nonprescription medication use by women during pregnancy; the rise in obesity and its association with structural defects; and a growing body of work regarding outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology. ConclusionThere are numerous risk factors, some modifiable, that have been proposed in recent years. These factors (associations) are only at the preliminary level in the causal chain and require replication. There is a need for more work on protective factors. The phenotypic characterization of cases with congenital defects has improved remarkably in recent years. However, there remains considerable concern with the precise characterization of exposures and the documentation of timing during embryologic development. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 103:652-655, 2015. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据