4.7 Article

The tumor affinity of chlorin e6 and its sonodynamic effects on non-small cell lung cancer

期刊

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 667-673

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.09.008

关键词

Sonodynamic therapy; Chlorin e6; Tumor affinity; Human lung adenocarcinoma cell; SPCA-1; Non-small cell lung cancer

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81172225, 81101821, 81000819]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong [2007A032000003]
  3. Science and Technology Foundation of Guangzhou [2011J4300063]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Sonodynamic therapy (SDT) is a promising new approach for cancer therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the tumor affinity of chlorin e6, a photosensitizer, and its sonodynamic effects on NSCLC. Methods: Human lung adenocarcinoma cells SPCA-1 and mice bearing SPCA-1 tumor xenograft were exposed to ultrasound in the presence or absence of chlorin e6. Chlorin e6 distribution was detected by laser scan confocal microscope. Cell apoptosis and necrosis were studied by flow cytometry analysis. Tumor size and weight were measured after different treatments. Results: The concentration of chlorin e6 in tumor tissue was remarkably higher than that in normal muscle near tumor, and the difference was greatest at 18 h (the fluorescence intensity was 5.38-fold higher in tumor than in muscle, P < 0.05). In vivo, ultrasound (0.4-1.6 W/cm(2)) or chlorin e6 (10-40 mg/kg) alone had no remarkable anti-tumor effects, but the combination of ultrasound (1.6 W/cm(2)) with chlorin e6 (SDT) hampered tumor growth significantly (P < 0.05). Intraperitoneal injection of 40 mg/kg chlorin e6 exerted no notable side effect on blood, liver and kidney function. Flow cytometry analysis showed that chlorin e6-mediated sonodynamic effect was mainly through the induction of cell necrosis. Conclusion: Chlorin e6 is a promising sonosensitizer and chlorin e6-mediated SDT may provide a new approach for NSCLC therapy. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据